for today, just a bunch of randomness that somehow ties together in my head:
- i finally started a
polyvore account. i think the thing that pushed me over to the other side was
meggy's post. perfect, right? i got all excited. i mean, i've seen a lot of
bad polyvore-ism out there, and i've always been afraid of contributing to that genre, but she gave me hope. a light at the end of the terrifying tunnel.
or at least a tasteful combination of garments and accessories.
(and i also got pretty worked up when i realized i could put things OTHER THAN CLOTHING into my collections... is that what you call them? collections? collages? god, i'm so new at this.)
- i got a
bunch of listings up in the
shop last night. finally back in business! yay!
i feel a little awful about how long it's taken me to get things back in there - especially since the ever-wonderful amber provided me with some GREATLY appreciated add space over at
painfully hip, which up until last night, when clicked upon, would lead directly to an empty shop.
i don't want to be that kind of person.
- on topic of the shop, i am starting to wonder now if maybe i should change the name. (yes, after all the effort i've exerted on creating this shop.) reasons?
this morning i awoke to find a rather snotty email in my ebay in-box that questioned my ethics in the listing of a certain non-vintage item.
my immediate reaction was a faster heart-rate as i thought "oh no! i listed something incorrectly!"
upon further inspection however, i reassured myself that i had not listed it incorrectly, and nowhere on the title or in the listing itself does it say "vintage."
here's the thing: i try my hardest to accurately list items. i'm really really happy with the shop, and where my life is at, and the freedom that running it gives me. i don't have to work for anyone. i can wake up when i want, i can drink coffee and wear bad outfits to my desk to do my work, i go thrifting for a living.
why would i want to do anything that could possibly harm this privilege?
i have spent what feels like the majority of the last 5+ years of my life working towards the point where i am at right now, so it seems obvious - to me at least - that i would not try to jeopardize this by trying to "trick" someone into thinking that a $9.00 item i've listed is something that it's not.
at one point i had a little note up in the shop that said something along the lines of "vintage and a handful of non-vintage, unique, one-of-a-kind, pieces," to explain the concept of the contents i chose. i realize now that it's no longer up, which is my fault, and i owe an apology to anyone out there who's absence it might confuse.
as someone in the customer-service industry, ultimately it is my job to ensure that the people who purchase (or browse through) the garments i have listed don't feel like i am trying to pull the wool over their eyes. i want them to feel like they honestly found something amazing, that it was accurately represented, even under-represented, so that they are surprised - in a good way - when they open the box.
i chose to add the word "vintage" to the end of my shop name because i do list a lot of vintage items - the majority of what i am drawn to and thus sell, are vintage garments.
however, (and i'm starting to feel like this might have been an error on my part), i also chose the word because i felt like it accurately summed up the aesthetic of the shop as a whole, and the type of girl it would appeal to.
there aren't a whole lot of helpful words out there to gracefully sum up the type of shop i (and a fast-growing group of others) have. unique? one-of-a-kind? these are what our parents want (or don't want) us to be. other than that there are the ever-dreaded handful of labels given to this specific subculture, most often used in a derogatory, name-calling, sort of way - hipster, indie - and honestly, i'm not confidant in my direction enough, to really take one of those words on, to "own it," to throw it back out there as a "yeah? and what? now buy the look."
i know that a lot of people "get it." (my thoughts here.)
they get that we don't really have a set, marketable category that we fit into - and that's the appeal, in a lot of ways. we're not total "hipsters." we're not "rockabilly" or "alt" or "goth." we don't dress in all 30's, all 60's, all 90's gear. we see the appeal in american apparel and thrift stores. sometimes something at forever 21 (god forbid) just works with what we feel that day. we understand the beauty in the high style and comfort of granny shoes. we make a lot of the things we wear.
i also know that we seem to be missing a term that we can use to sum ourselves up in an easygoing, self-confidant, no-unpleasant-implications sort of way, so in turn, a lot of us have clung to the word "vintage."
these thoughts started forming a while back, and i think they really boiled to the top for the first time a few months ago, when i stumbled upon the message board containing all the gossip about why the nasty gal vintage shop had shut down on ebay.
she seemed to be doing so well - fantastically well - and then one day she was just gone. (as it turns out, she just started a web site where she sells with a set price, rather than auction form.)
there have been plenty of rumors that nasty gal was shut down by ebay for running her auctions in an un-ethical way, which, if true, i fully support. however, after a handful of posts regarding this, the message board became nothing but page after page (i'm talking like, twenty plus pages here,) of nothing but one catty vintage seller after another tearing apart everything from her use of the word "vintage," to the shape and poses of her models. "they look like they starve themselves." "they pose like they have to go to the bathroom."
this from people - grown people! - who then want us to take them seriously as sellers.
i know a lot of this stems from jealousy - when you succeed at something - especially in the public eye - many people become bitterly jealous. and when you do it with pretty skinny models - or are pretty and/or skinny yourself - people accuse you of just flat out being a scam.
it doesn't matter that nasty gal's auctions were ending in the $200 range - by the choice of her bidders.
she should not be taken seriously because she found (or employed!) skinny pretty girls.
if her tactics in reaching these outrageous end bids were dishonest, then by all means, shut her down, but, by the looks of her listings, she put a lot of work into her shop, and in the end, is it possible that all that hard work just paid off?
in my mind there are two categories here: the shops that are run like real, full-time businesses - where the girls (or boys) have nice backdrops, have taken the time and effort to learn about photography, understand lighting, style each garment in a flattering way, use attractive models in professional looking poses, go on buying trips, promote their shop like a real business...
and then there are the shops that are run like a hobby - which is fine - but what's not ok, in my book, is when rather than gather inspiration and ideas from the people who are clearly finding success, these people spend hours - and hours - posting bitchy remarks on public message boards about the weight of the models.
to break it down even further, (and i know you're dying for me to do this, in fact, i hear you screaming right now, "please diana! don't end this post now! it's just not long enough! i want to miss two meals today in my attempt to finish this in one sitting!") i think that there are two categories of vintage sellers.
i think there are the ones who fit into the category above - the "hipster"-ish fashion-obsessed indie girls and boys who love vintage pieces, but not necessarily for the integrity of the age, but the uniqueness of the piece, and then there are the true, die-hard, vintage-down-to-the-exact-date-it-came-off-the-assembly-line fans and collectors, who demand (and rightly so) that the pieces they are bidding on be totally, absolutely, beyond a shadow of a doubt, accurately labeled.
and in my humble opinion, as much as these vintage sellers on the message boards claim to be clamoring for the cause of the latter, i really just don't see it as being an issue. i don't think that the collectors, the people trolling ebay for authentic edwardian dresses, are going to stumble upon a shop like mine, (or nasty gal vintage, with altered pieces and risque editorial-ish styling), and say "oh my. this is exactly what i'm looking for, i must outbid the $250 this skinny blazer is already at."
let her call it vintage.
if it's from the 80's, it truly is, at this point.
what other word do we have?
and as much as "customer service" means serving the customer, i also feel that one of the best things about ebay is the freedom it gives people to list what they love and can truly get behind, and yes, there are some shady, scamming sellers out there who are doing everything they can to fool even the most discerning vintage shopper, but for the most part, the people who make this their life - and i promise you, if you have opened even a halfway decent shop, it IS your life - they are doing it because it's what they love to do, not to fool a customer. just as with everything in life, along with honesty in exchange, there is personal responsibility in the choices we make, and if you don't feel comfortable bidding $9.99 on a dress that wasn't marked "vintage," (or even $250 on one that was,) you have the choice of not doing it.
there are a million other things on ebay.
i'm sure you can find one that you like.